Men and earrings didn't start their relationship just the other day. If those conservativsts are for real then maybe they should be stopping our female counterparts from wearing this ornament, other than men. Men have worn earrings for as long as civilization has existed. Jade earrings dating to 3000 BC have been found in Southeast Asia. Many of those earrings adorned men, not women. Modern day questions about what earring wearing symbolizes for men are rooted in phobias about sexuality and gender. The basis of those phobias is the belief that gender is a strict binary relationship, that one can only be one or the other, and that anything that does not make it absolutely clear what gender you are takes away your masculinity and makes you a homosexual. Binary genderism requires an all or nothing approach to gender expression. The reality, though, is that trends come and go as fashions rooted in historical necessity fade into obscurity. Wearing a stud therefore really bears no definite character definition, it is a fashion statement as any other. Our fore fathers in Kenya actually did wear rings in their ears, and were never a reason for them not to become elders in their respective communities. From the first time primitive man pierced himself with a tooth or a bit of bone, earrings were one of many adornments that spoke of power: the ability to conquer something larger and more dangerous than himself, in order to protect himself, the tribe and the local food supply. Use of horns and teeth were particularly prized, as these showed just how difficult the battle for survival had been, proving the man's fitness to mate, to hunt and to lead. From these bone ornaments, earrings evolved to include any rare and difficult to obtain substance that could be molded, shaped, carved or otherwise embellished to attract attention and give the message that the wearer was someone who mattered. They were a sign of great people. Not losers as some people tend to think. Earrings and other jewelry were symbols of power, wealth and ownership. Women were only gifted with earrings and other jewelry upon becoming brides. Those who chose to serve the powerful and wealthy rather than seek their own power and wealth took earrings and other jewelry in exchange for their pledge of service. This only goes to show that there is no much ado concerning a stud on a man's ear, hence its so stupid of us to let a country revolve around such a minor jewellery.
The simple reason that Dr. Willy Mutunga, a man of integrity and more so a champion of change wears a stud should not be a reason to go for a mediocre professional. Those other judges that have previously been in the courts have their hands smeared with corruption and guilt, they do not deserve the post either. I mean, who else is more capable? Mind you, Dr. Willy Mutunga has had himself imprisoned for his activism, he is the right person suited for the job.
The other possibly contentious issue is that concerning Dr. Mutunga and his claims of speaking to his ancestors. The question in hand is whether this is associated to what most would term, 'dark forces'. Traditionally, our fore-fathers would often speak to their ancestors. N.B speaking to ancestors is completely different from reincarnations of the dead, as ancestors are dead, yet an ancestor is not just any dead person. Not professing the same religions as Dr. Willy Mutunga, I wouldn't want to rush into judging him on his religious belief. However, our country boasts of an active Supreme Council of Muslim Elders who have in the past been fast to direct Kenyans concerning Muslim beliefs. If the council finds it appropriate for him, I find it rather hilarious that those that seem to judge him are from extremely opposite beliefs. What I however do infer is that the church is fast to judge since they are inwardly discriminatory in relation to religious divide. If so is the case, Lord have mercy.
Ironically, a day after the Catholic Church came out spitting fire concerning the looming appointment, one of their own men of the cloth was apprehended for sodomy claims. Maybe the Church needs to clean up its closet before openly discriminating others.
It is also interesting that the same people who fought against the new constitution are the first to disqaulify these appointments. Remember the church and the likes of Ruto spearheading the red team? The same are opposed to these appointments. They are non reformists who are sittinh themselves into cocoons and comfort-zones and do not wish that what they fought against is now reigning supreme. Its high time we gave up listening to them, because even Nehemiah, had he listened to those who opposed him, Jerusalem's temples would have never been built.
Kenya currently has no chief justice as Evans Gicheru retired after his term ended. Therefore for a currently that is in dire need of Judicial reform, it is wise for those appointments to be made early enough. The New Constitution creates a more versatile chief justice, and likewise a strong judiciary, hence the best, and only the best should be entrusted with this jobs. For me, none is better than Dr. Willy Mutunga.
ushasema, this notion of questioning war hr clads is propitious and with no basis. If the man can work well even with slippers on while in office then let him be .
ReplyDeleteits all about service delivery.... i dont care how! provided the rule of law is adhered to.Dr. Willy is more that fit for this job
ReplyDeleteYEA MZITO.STUDS HAVE BEEN WON BY MEN SINCE TIME MEMORIAL,THIS WERE AS A SIGN OF INITIATION, WEALTH A STAGE OR A CLICK.THEY HAVE NO BASIS.WHOEVER IS RESISTING MUTUNGA FOR HIS STUD GIVES US EVIDENCE THAT HES ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAS STOLE FROM KENYA BECAUSE HE HAS NO BASIS SO HE IS TRYING TO USE THE LAST KICKS TO FIGHT AN ENEMY WHO HAS PINNED HIM DOWN.AWA TOBOA ROUND HII SI MCHEZO NI MUTUNGA,MADTRAXX,MAKWEEZEE.HAHA.
ReplyDeleteYour argument is absolutely reasonable but if you have read keenly the suit compiled by Harrison Kinyanjui, advocate of the High Court, you will see that these debates go further than a mere stud or mere speculation of homosexuality. Call me an anti-reformist but I have Kenya's best interests at heart
ReplyDeletemote, kindly tell me what u think i have overlooked in reference to the suit you are toking about
ReplyDeleteThe stud is nothing, believe me as much as I don't support his communication with the outside world, I think he has all the right and supported by the Kenyan Law to do that. The problem with this guy is that he has no experience at all in the Judiciary and many people would look at that as an advantage claiming that he has not been tainted with corruption, these allegations are just overrated if you asked me. This Alnashir dude in the JSC, keeps on quoting the USA and its development in the judiciary but even them, they have never in history appointed a junior like Mutunga to head a body that is of so much importance in the running of their country and putting another inexperienced one as his deputy adds salt to injury! The problem with this kind of setting is that, the two will be so open minded and will listen to advice from their experienced colleagues; advice that is good or bad! It is now not a secret that Mutunga went to Uganda to champion for gay rights and that his deputy is currently doing a research on the same. As much as I don't oppose it, the two have been silent on this issue. Why can't they come out clean? So the question that arises is, were Dr. Mutunga and Nancy Barasa suggested because there was found no one else better? I don't think so. And the rumour going around that the JSC had someone already even before the interview, I trust so!
ReplyDeletewell i get your arguement. but one thing notable is that, its better to have someone who is rather in experienced other than someone who is experienced in corruption, injustice and all other norms. for a person who has been in practice for almost 30 years i think its commendable, and mind you the systems are new so its easy for anyone to cope. about their stand on homosexuality, i believe this is all misconstrued. dr. willy himself made it so clear when he said that it doesnt matter what HE thinks concerning homosexuality, abortion and what have you. he is obliged to follow the law like any other kenyan irrespective of personal opinion.
ReplyDeleteLike I said I respect his opinion but I have searched far and wide for a judgment that Willy Mutunga has written, guess what? The proposed new Chief Justice has NEVER written any. That alone is enough to disqualify him for the job, it doesn't matter how many years he has practiced!! What can we judge him by? Well, before Gicheru was appointed, everyone thought he would make the best CJ but after sometime, nature took its course...it won't be long before we start complaining about these two. As they will realize with time, being a CJ in this country is all about holding the office, someone else does the job. Even this backlog thing, you can't blame it on the CJ. There is lack of manpower in the grassroots. What we need is more judges to be appointed!!
ReplyDeletewell dr. willy mutunga has never been a judge before and that is why u couldnt find his judgement. about what you are saying about evance gicheru thogh is rather misplaced, before he got their the systems were a total mess, and what he has done is his best considering he has been working with wrong systems and people. remember what he did when he first came to office? he formed a tribunal, released a list of shame and shown the door to those corrupt ones that were too unfortunate to be caught... dr. mutunga is a reformist, he has proved so, to an extent he got deatined for it... he may not be the best but he is the best chance we got, that is for certain
ReplyDeletewhat he is, is an activist! and you said it, he doesn't have a judgment to his name then it is very clear that the standards used to interview him were different from those used to interview the other judges and to me, that is not fair and to say that all judges are corrupt and Dr. Mutunga is not is also a big misjudgment!!
ReplyDelete